fbpx
Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube Rss
Search
Close this search box.
Pillar

The Human Person

The first pillar of a decent society is respect for the human person, which recognizes that all individual human beings have dignity simply because of the kind of being they are: animals whose rational faculties allow them to know, love, reason, and communicate. It also recognizes that human beings are persons, members of the human family who flourish in a community that respects their fundamental rights and who long to discover transcendent truths about the nature of reality.

The Religion That Remade the World

By
Read More

Learn more about the Human Person: get your free eBook today!

Subscribe
Subscribe
Subscribe
Subscribe
Subscribe
Public Discourse
  • Islam

Islam’s Scholars for Dollars

By
Many Muslims do not have the financial resources or social clout to combat political and religious extremism. Such extremism is further enabled by scholars who let themselves be bought by the rich or powerful.
Public Discourse

Collaborative Reproduction and the Things We Should Not Do

By
The city council of Washington, DC should consider the psychological damage to children that would come of a new bill legalizing surrogacy contracts.
Public Discourse

What Are the Rights of Donor-Conceived People?

By
Third party reproduction corrupts the parent-child relationship and disrespects the humanity of donor-conceived people.
Public Discourse

My Isl@m’s Quest for Truth

By
A young Muslim author learns to seek the truth about God through questioning instead of blind faith.
Public Discourse

First New England, Then the Nation: The Spread of Physician-Assisted Suicide

By
The expansion of physician-assisted suicide from the West to the East coast makes its legalization in other neighboring states much more likely.
Public Discourse

Without Words to Describe

By
Those of us who value life over death, vibrant religious exercise, and the good of natural marriage need to find our voice again even though the powers-that-be are redefining words arbitrarily and avoiding reason.
Public Discourse

The Ongoing Culture War: A Report from the Texan Frontlines

By
The abortion fight in Texas is a flashpoint in the culture war. But it need not be another skirmish in which the casualty is civility and reason. It is rather an opportunity for pro-lifers to seize the high ground of decorum and reasonableness.
Public Discourse

The Constitutionality of Protecting Unborn Babies at 20 Weeks

By
There is nothing in the text, history, or tradition of the U.S. Constitution that precludes extending the most basic protections of the law to twenty week-old (or older) unborn children who are capable of experiencing pain. Adapted from testimony delivered on July 8th before the Texas State Senate Committee on Health and Human Services.
Public Discourse

Euphemisms: The Modus Operandi of Death Rights Advocates

By
Death rights advocates can only win supporters by calling the act of killing something else.
Public Discourse

Why Religious Liberty Became Controversial: The Left and Jean-Jacques Rousseau

By
The Left is adopting a Rousseauian view of religion’s role in public life: the state is to determine where, when, and how religious instruction should be permissible for citizens.
Public Discourse

Cuomo’s Women’s Equality Act Will Harm Women

By and
It doesn’t advance women’s equality or wellbeing for the law to allow late-term abortions for any reasons pertinent to a woman’s “health.”
Public Discourse

Negligence, Insensitivity, or Murder?

By
Kermit Gosnell was not sentenced to life imprisonment for sloppiness, for insensitivity, for bad keepsakes, for a backed up drain, for fleas, or even for making women suffer. He was sentenced to life imprisonment for murdering three babies.
Public Discourse

Kermit Gosnell: Epiphany for Birthers?

By
It is neither the impossibility of writing clear laws nor our inability to witness abortion that stops us from making it illegal. Instead it is the will to kill for convenience that drives some people to sustain the fiction that human life begins at birth.
Public Discourse

Kermit Gosnell and the Logic of “Pro-Choice”

By
Kermit Gosnell has been the equivalent of the American slave-dealer—someone who has done work rendered absolutely necessary by the twisted laws of his regime, but who has nevertheless been ignored or regarded with unease, and even repulsion, by his fellow citizens.
Public Discourse

Did Senator Lee Forget the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act?

By
We don’t need a new resolution from Congress to address the wrongs of clinics like Kermit Gosnell’s—the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act already serves that purpose, and we should restore the civil penalties originally attached to it.
Public Discourse

Gosnell, Law, and Modest First Steps

By
The Gosnell case shows us that a society’s laws teach, and if they teach a lesson of injustice they will corrupt its people over time. Indeed, contemporary abortion jurisprudence undermines the very notion of natural rights and constitutional government.
Public Discourse

The President, Planned Parenthood, and “Quality Health Care”

By
President Obama’s recent address to Planned Parenthood’s National Conference sweepingly mischaracterized abortion restrictions and pro-life views as culturally inaccurate and outdated.
Public Discourse

Total Brain Death: Valid Criterion of Death

By and
Total brain death is a valid criterion for pronouncing the death of human beings.
Public Discourse

Abortion After Tiller

By
A new documentary on late-term abortion providers shows us that the abortion debate is much more about why life is valuable than about when human life begins.
Public Discourse

Marriage, Religious Liberty, and the Ban Myth

By
It’s a myth that marriage law “bans” same-sex relationships because it treats marriage as the union of a man and a woman.
Public Discourse

Our First Right: Religious Liberty

By
America’s founding documents assume an implicitly religious anthropology—an idea of human nature, nature’s God, and natural rights—that many of our leaders no longer share. Adapted from testimony submitted to the United States Commission on Civil Rights.
Public Discourse

Abortion and Our “Moral Sense”

By
When intellectual arguments against abortion fail to persuade, recourse must be had to images and strategies that awake what David Hume considered our “moral sense.”
Public Discourse

Direct Killing as Intentional Killing

By
True doctors and abortionists are different kinds of persons because they perform different acts as they carry out different proposals: the one, a proposal to remove a non-viable child to save the mother; the other, to kill that child for the mother’s benefit.
Public Discourse

Deciding Who Gets Religious Freedom: The Latest HHS “Accommodation”

By
In the latest proposed version of the HHS mandate, the government presumes to say which employers get religious freedom and how much they get, but all religious employers are obligated to live out their beliefs and should have the freedom to do so.
Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube Rss
Public Discourse © 2024 | All Rights Reserved

Get your free eBook for The Human Person

"*" indicates required fields

Get your free eBook for Sexuality & Family

Get your free eBook for Politics & Law

Get your free eBook for Education & Culture

Get your free eBook for Business & Economics