fbpx
Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube Rss
Search
Close this search box.
Pillar

The Human Person

The first pillar of a decent society is respect for the human person, which recognizes that all individual human beings have dignity simply because of the kind of being they are: animals whose rational faculties allow them to know, love, reason, and communicate. It also recognizes that human beings are persons, members of the human family who flourish in a community that respects their fundamental rights and who long to discover transcendent truths about the nature of reality.

Cultivating a Holistic Feminism

By
Read More

Learn more about the Human Person: get your free eBook today!

Subscribe
Subscribe
Subscribe
Subscribe
Subscribe
Public Discourse

Direct Killing as Intentional Killing

By
True doctors and abortionists are different kinds of persons because they perform different acts as they carry out different proposals: the one, a proposal to remove a non-viable child to save the mother; the other, to kill that child for the mother’s benefit.
Public Discourse

Deciding Who Gets Religious Freedom: The Latest HHS “Accommodation”

By
In the latest proposed version of the HHS mandate, the government presumes to say which employers get religious freedom and how much they get, but all religious employers are obligated to live out their beliefs and should have the freedom to do so.
Public Discourse

Bad Science and Failed Freedom Protections in the HHS Mandate

By
The latest proposed amendment to the HHS mandate still draws on empirically unsound data and violates religious freedom.
Public Discourse

Reflections of a Former Fetus and Former Incubator

By
Radical pro-choice rhetoric attacks the most basic facts of our human existence: that the human body comes in two different but complementary types, male and female. They cannot forgive women who embrace femininity rather than neuter themselves.
Public Discourse

A New Way Forward on Abortion

By
Pro-lifers and pro-choicers alike should consider a constitutional amendment that would allow, but not require, states to ban abortion in the second trimester.
Public Discourse

An Unrecognizable America

By
If the HHS mandate is enforced, our government may provoke a schism in the American Catholic Church and will reduce faithful Catholics to second-class citizenship.
Public Discourse

Abortion and the Constitution in Another Forty Years: A Right to Life for 2053

By
As we recognize the fortieth anniversary of Roe v. Wade, pro-lifers should consider supporting a constitutional amendment to abolish abortion forty years from now.
Public Discourse

The Paradox of Persons Forty Years After Roe

By
The Roe Court’s suppression of a foundational question—who is the law for—means that the decision could be overturned by any of several feticide cases that could reach the current Court.
Public Discourse

The Real Reason to Criticize Roe

By
Pro-lifers need to better understand the history of the pro-life movement and what Roe did to it.
Public Discourse

Abortion Promises Unfulfilled

By
Forty years after Roe v. Wade, the promise that legal abortion would guarantee fewer out-of-wedlock births, less child abuse, and lower crime rates remains unfulfilled.
Public Discourse

Forty Years Later: It’s Time for a New Feminism

By
A feminism that promotes abortion as the key to women’s freedom does not help us flourish, preserve our dignity, or protect us from evils. We must support women so that the “choice” between life and abortion is no longer difficult because life is the natural choice.
Public Discourse

On the 40th Anniversary of Roe v. Wade: A Public Discourse Symposium

By
Witness to the truth matters for its own sake, but persistent, winsome witness also tends to bear good fruit, even if it takes 40 years and counting.
Public Discourse

Conscientious Abortions? We Don’t Need New Laws Protecting Abortionists

By
A recent argument that abortion providers deserve the same legal protection as pro-life medical providers is philosophically flawed and ignores legal and popular consensus on the evil of abortion.
Public Discourse

Law’s Logic at the End of Life

By
To its detriment, Howard Ball’s new book on end-of-life law focuses more on the emotions and biases of the law’s defenders than on law’s history and content.
Public Discourse

Bringing Marx into the Abortion Debate

By
Two points can best persuade young people about abortion: our need for laws that protect the weak and vulnerable and the deadening of conscience that often accompanies pro-choice sentiment.
Public Discourse

Science and the Politics of Personhood

By
Science can and should help determine sound public policy on matters that involve basic human rights.
Public Discourse

The GOP and Social Issues: Sophomoric Arguments at the Wall Street Journal

By
By discarding its support for life, marriage, and religious freedom, the GOP, contrary to what some party members think, will doom itself to minority status.
Public Discourse

Medicine’s Dance with Death

By
A physician-philosopher argues that modern medicine is oriented toward the dead body because it is no longer informed by an ultimate purpose for human existence.
Public Discourse

Potentiality Rightly Understood

By
From the beginning of its existence a human being is always already a person because personhood belongs to it essentially as an instance of that natural kind. The second of a two-part series.
Public Discourse

Potential Misunderstandings

By
Pro-choice philosophers err in their criticism of the pro-life position because they do not understand potentiality in terms of a being’s essential properties. The first of a two-part series.
Public Discourse

Rape, Conception, and God: Why Mourdock Was Right

By
Richard Mourdock’s comment didn’t imply that God wills rape; instead, it reminds us that God wills a great good in the coming-to-be of any human life, regardless of the evil circumstances surrounding its conception.
Public Discourse

Promoting Women’s Equality in Pakistan

By
An assassination attempt on a 14-year-old girl reminds us that we need to promote better education and equality for women in Pakistan.
Public Discourse

The Right to Do Good

By
Two incompatible conceptions of rights are at stake in the debate over the HHS mandate.
Public Discourse

The Religious Liberty Case Against Religious Liberty Litigation: Non-Universal Exemptions and Judicial Overreach

By
Current lawsuits against the HHS contraceptive mandate may undermine religious liberty in the long run. Not all religious objectors to the mandate are likely to be exempted even if the lawsuits are successful, and judges violate the core meaning of religious liberty when they assess plaintiffs’ religious character. The first in a two-part series.
Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube Rss
Public Discourse © 2024 | All Rights Reserved

Get your free eBook for The Human Person

"*" indicates required fields

Get your free eBook for Sexuality & Family

Get your free eBook for Politics & Law

Get your free eBook for Education & Culture

Get your free eBook for Business & Economics