fbpx
Search Results For:

Search Results for: days – Page 30

Public employee unions aren’t the only seekers of government largesse.
President Obama has dropped the defense of marriage out of political convenience rather than reasonable opposition.
A man who made a career of death and lies became a hero for life and truth.
A new bill is needed to fix the healthcare law’s failure to adequately safeguard conscience
It is at our own peril that we ignore the nexus between moral convictions, the institutions in which they are realized, and our economic culture.
Intellectuals have failed to recognize the real character of the Tea Party.
In an article adapted from his debate last week with Peter Singer and Maggie Little on the moral status of the “fetus,” Professor Finnis explains that outside of medical contexts use of the word “fetus” is offensive, dehumanizing, prejudicial, and manipulative. It obscures our perception of moral reality. Moral status is not a matter of choice or grant or convention, but of recognition, of someone who matters, and matters as an equal, whether we like it or not.
It’s time for conservatives and liberals alike to remember that certain words by their very utterance inflict injury.
A review of The German Mujahid by Boualem Sansal.
The so-called “week-after pill” is an abortion drug hidden under the guise of contraception.
Americans must still wrestle with what it means to take the lives of innocent civilians intentionally.
The fiftieth anniversary of oral contraceptives is a reminder of all the things the Pill lets us forget.
The bailout of Greece is a stunning about-face that calls into question Europe’s commitment to a stable currency.
The nature of children’s education matters to jihadists. It should matter to us, too.
New technological developments and pressing national needs suggest that the future of higher education may be one friendlier to the classical tradition of liberal education.
Both Marc Thiessen and his critics have misunderstood an important moral distinction on the question of torture.
Why we shouldn't listen to calls to get rid of the filibuster.
As we celebrate the 200th anniversary of Charles Darwin’s birth and the 150th anniversary of the publication of On the Origin of Species, it is time to realize that the best way to honor his legacy is to fight its overextension and misapplication into the realm of politics. The first in a two-part series.
If citizens and politicians believe that victory is to the loudest, or to the most dramatic, then loud and dramatic they will be. The process of public discourse, by contrast, is often deliberative, difficult, and slow. Its participants must, on occasion, “dare to be boring.”
If conservatives wish to defend culture, they must support the arts. Their support for the arts, however, should be motivated by a love of beauty rather than any political program.
Millions of Americans believe that states can prohibit abortion in the third trimester, yet current Supreme Court jurisprudence has manufactured a right to unfettered abortion right up to the time of the child’s birth. How did Americans become so confused on this issue and how did the Supreme Court end up where it has?
Recently, the editor of Public Discourse sat down with Robert P. George to discuss the state of the marriage debate. While supporters of same-sex “marriage” claim that history is on their side, it turns out that supporters of traditional marriage have more reasons for hope than they may realize.
Three months into President Obama’s first term, one of his most prominent pro-life opponents, Robert P. George, engaged in a discussion with one of his most prominent pro-life supporters, Douglas W. Kmiec. The article below is adopted from George's remarks, which called for candid speech on Obama's abortion record.
The senators who originally designed our family planning policies believed that the mostly black welfare population was incurably lazy, promiscuous, intellectually substandard, and a burden on public schools, and, moreover, that they probably would remain so indefinitely. Birth control, therefore, was in their eyes a way to reduce the number of these undesirable people. This article is the second installment in a three-part series.