fbpx
Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube Rss
Hadley Arkes

Hadley Arkes

Hadley Arkes is the Ney Professor of Jurisprudence Emeritus at Amherst College and the Founder and Director of the James Wilson Institute on Natural Rights and the American Founding in Washington, D.C.

supreme court, dark, night

The Conservative Legal Movement at the Edge of Schism

By
Josh Craddock’s vision for a post-Roe legislative agenda imaginatively builds on and renews decades of pro-life thinking, but it risks generating resistance within the conservative legal movement. There may be an alternative, more disarming path that conveys to the public the need for Congress to act to protect human life in the womb.
Pro-Life Sign

Josh Hawley and the Advantages of Jujitsu

By
Senator Hawley should turn the tables during confirmation hearings and force Democrats to defend their abortion extremism. What’s more, he should act on precedents stemming from the days of Lincoln down to our own, precedents involving the authority of the political branches to counter at times and limit the holdings of the Supreme Court.
Interview

Friends Clashing—Yet One More Time—On Free Speech

By and
Hadley Arkes and Robert Miller go one more round on the moral norms that govern speech and the government’s authority in prohibiting immoral speech.

Classical Liberalism against Relativism

By
Robert Miller’s defense of free speech risks removing the moral ground that could explain the rightness or goodness of the freedom we seek to preserve. In place of a moral defense in principle, we would simply have a set of utilitarian guesses: that if we pretend we have no standards of judgment, things will work out better for us in the long run.

Free Speech, Ordinary People, and Ordinary Judgments: Hadley Arkes responds to Robert Miller

By
In drawing on the older teaching of the courts, Hadley Arkes argues that it is far more tenable for the Court to teach again the difference between epithets and arguments.

Can Trump Be the Man Eisenhower Was?

By
It’s time for another Morningside Heights Declaration.

Substantive Due Process: What is the Question, and Why Does It Matter?

By
In debates over marriage and abortion, we should make arguments based on constitutional texts and judicial precedent. But would it be legitimate also for judges to consider overarching questions of justice and natural law?

Recovering Lincoln’s Teaching on the Limits to the Courts–and Giving the News to David Blankenhorn

By
History clearly demonstrates that the legislative branch can legitimately act to counter the rulings of the judicial branch. This is as true for marriage as it was for slavery.

Judging Beliefs and Shaping Laws: A Reply to Robert Miller

By
Legislators and judges not only can but must gauge the moral justification of every law.

Did Senator Lee Forget the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act?

By
We don’t need a new resolution from Congress to address the wrongs of clinics like Kermit Gosnell’s—the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act already serves that purpose, and we should restore the civil penalties originally attached to it.

That’s Entertainment: Free Speech and the Moral Regulation of the Arts

By
A recent Supreme Court case reveals a division amongst conservatives over the moral foundations of the law.

When Speaking Falsely is Right

By
All lying is immoral, but not all false utterances are lies.

The Grounds of Our Judgments

By
Wrapping up an exchange on judgment and morality.

Kant the Bogey Man

By
Kant was right: we need principles to guide our judgments.

The Particular Appeal of Universal Principles

By
Responding to a review of his most recent book, Hadley Arkes asks some questions about the nature of natural law.

Swastikas, Burning Crosses, and “God Hates Fags”

By
It’s time for conservatives and liberals alike to remember that certain words by their very utterance inflict injury.

Higher Education and the Political Regime

By
All education is moral education, because it carries an understanding of the things worth knowing—and a hierarchy of the things more or less worthy of being known. Moral education must also point to a certain end: an understanding of the ways of life that are better or worse for human beings. It must point to a certain kind of political regime in providing the cast of our lives: the laws that protect the integrity of families and the professions, and the terms of principle on which a decent people deserve to live. The following article is adapted from the Commencement Address Arkes delivered at Hillsdale College on May 10, 2009.

Democrats, Obama, and Abortion: Turning Liberalism Incoherent

By
Can the Democratic Party's awkward position on infanticide and abortion be regarded as simply a lesser matter in an ensemble of "other issues" of higher standing? Or does that position challenge the very coherence of everything else that a liberal party proclaims itself to be?
Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube Rss

Public Discourse © 2023 / All Rights Reserved