We need docile teachers and students, those unafraid of the fundamental questions and the highest things: those who want truth.
Author: R.J. Snell (R.J. Snell)
Post
Better to Give than to Receive: Catholicism and the Enlightenment
In science and philosophy, politics and society, the Enlightenment and the Faith could and did bring mutual intelligibility to each other, showing no intrinsic incompatibility—“faith cannot collide with enlightened reason,” a new book reminds us, for truth cannot contradict truth.
Post
Ancient Wisdom in Barren Times
Far too many of us, even the most tender and gentle, have absorbed the hypothesis that a refusal of life is the condition of love.
Post
No Longer Calm, But Alive: Robert Royal’s Catholic Humanism
Robert Royal makes the case that, despite a twentieth-century period of confusion and fragmentation, Christian humanism has been renewed and revitalized, so that today it is “as alive as it has ever been.”
Post
Prudence and Moral Absolutes
Refusing to make exceptions to absolute moral norms is not unrealistic, imprudent, or inhumane. The purpose of norms is to promote human flourishing and protect what is good
Post
Blind Resentment
The struggle against Catholicism in today’s culture is not particularly about religion. It is a revolt against reason and reality. Many have internalized such resentment that they are unable to see truth.
Post
Rehabbing Authenticity in an Ideological Age
We can only define ourselves authentically in terms of, in Charles Taylor’s words, a “backdrop of things that matter”—a set of values that transcend our arbitrary choices. The second of a two-part series.
Post
Authenticity and the End of Rhetoric
Our current jargon of “authenticity” is an affront to political friendship—it demands that others always capitulate to our claims, and makes not doing so tantamount to harm. The first of a two-part series.
Post
Natural Law is neither Useless nor Dangerous: A Response to Hart and Potemra
A recent claim to reject the natural law for its uselessness and false claims to neutrality misunderstands the first-personal perspective of contemporary natural law. The second in a two-part series.
Post
Understanding Natural Law: A Response to Hart and Potemra
A recent claim to reject the natural law risks misunderstanding the role of reason and overlooks the difference between practical reasoning and morality. The first in a two-part series.
Post
Reason and Compassion in the Marriage Debate
In their book What Is Marriage? Man and Woman: A Defense, Sherif Girgis, Ryan T. Anderson, and Robert P. George draw our attention to the question that matters most in the marriage debate—what marriage is—and make a reasonable and compassionate argument for marriage as a one-man one-woman union.
Post
Saving Natural Law from Itself
Naïve proponents and skeptics of the natural law often point to the world “out there” as the source of objective truth (or lack thereof), but the truths of the natural law are to be found through the actions of our intellect.
Post
Liberal Love and Sargent Shriver
It’s far too easy when bickering about this or that policy, and particularly when the policy is morally charged, to miss the values modeled by good men and women when we disagree on the means.
Post
Is the Natural Law Persuasive?
One can neither deny nor question the natural law’s persuasiveness except by asking questions, conducting inquiries, achieving understandings, reaching judgments, and making choices—all of which are the natural law at work.
Post
Intelligible Goods, Marriage, and Intellectual Conversion
Unless we ask the “what” and “why” in ethical debate, we aren’t doing ethics. Debating ethics requires intellectual conversion and thus a commitment to intelligible reality.
Post
Protest and Reason
In order to stop our present decline, we must transcend our natural tendency to retreat into factions and instead begin to sacrifice for the common good.
Post
Offense and Criticism in the Marriage Debates
To take offense does not free us from further argument or criticism. Instead, offense demands ongoing criticism between partners in ethical discourse as a recognition of their fundamental human equality.
Post
The Shock of Recognition
Newly defined and vigorously enforced rights have proliferated even as they are uprooted from any philosophic grounding.
Post
Marriage and the Law of Tradition
Custom and tradition, far from being necessarily irrational, are often the vehicles of guiding and binding reason.
Post
Universities and the Graciousness of Being
Civility is at the foundation of democratic society, but our educational institutions have lost their manners and the grace of gentility.
Post
Remembering the Pill
The fiftieth anniversary of oral contraceptives is a reminder of all the things the Pill lets us forget.
Post
Desires Natural and Unnatural: A Reply to Paul Griffiths
A recent First Things article on natural law misses the mark.
Post
Bad Reason and the ‘Manhattan Declaration’
A good deal of online commentary about a recent ecumenical statement misunderstands the nature of human reason.