The new year brings with it the promise of hope. But it seems we’ve utterly lost sense of what hope even means. Hope, to us, seems like thinking we will become the “best version of ourselves” in the new year, or we will manifest our way to success, or we will suddenly encounter great riches. All of these things, of course, are within our reach should we only commit to our daily gratitude practices, 5 a.m. meditations, or ice baths. And if after all of this we don’t transform into the version of ourselves we’ve visualized, we fall into the lap of despair.
Thankfully, R. J. Snell in his recent book Lost in the Chaos: Immanence, Despair, Hope, sets the record straight. Hope, he tells us, “does not do an end-run around our responsibility and our cooperation but allows them to be fruitful, albeit without the hint of the illusion of mastery or its tyranny, without the pretenses of rationalism, the frenzied pointlessness of denuded nature, or the idylls of faux-enchantments.” He explains that hope “allows us to grow into the full stature of the children of God, capable of acting, of becoming an acting person.”
Hope, then, doesn’t assure us that we will always thrive, that we will never suffer. Hope leads us to the authentic freedom that comes only from true self-mastery. As Snell writes: “Hope is not blind, or merely optimistic. . . . Hope is a virtue. It is a state that perfects us, makes us well, capable of thinking, living, and acting in the freedom of excellence, as flourishing human beings.”
Given the great cultural confusion about what hope actually is, it is no coincidence that it is a common and unifying theme across all our essays. This month was no exception. Jayd Henricks spoke to the heroic charity required of church leaders in an age of great confusion. Nathaniel Peters reflected on the example of hope we have in the legacy of Richard John Neuhaus. Marcus Gibson shared a new way to think of healing—lamentation, a posture “enlivened by hope rather than rendered morbid by despair.” And Micah Watson’s insightful review of Russell Moore’s Losing Our Religion shares the anguish of many in the evangelical community who feel separated from the very tradition that nurtured them.
Start your day with Public DiscourseSign up and get our daily essays sent straight to your inbox.
Public Discourse is free of charge to readers, which means we rely on the generosity of our donors. Please consider supporting our important work.
Other Noteworthy Pieces from This Month:
- Chris Tollefsen, “An Ethics Advice Column”
- Alexandra Davis and Tara Isabella Burton, “Reality Is Discovered, Not Made”
- Rachel Lu, “The End of Feminism”
- Matt Franck, “Is Trump Disqualified from the Presidency?” and Michael W. McConnell’s thoughtful response
What We’re Reading around the Web
Our editors recommend the following as worth a click:
- Louise Perry, “We Will All Become Boring,” Maiden Mother Matriarch
- Felix Miller, “Of Tradwives and Men,” Fairer Disputations
- Jake Meador, “Reflections on the Evangelical Fracturing, Ten Years In,” Mere Orthodoxy
- James Hankins, “An Honest Diversity Statement,” Law & Liberty
- James Fishback, “The Truth about Banned Books,” The Free Press
- Robert Conquest, “The Somber Monster,” The New York Review
Thanks for reading PD.