The Supreme Court’s ruling upholding the Affordable Care Act is constitutionally correct. This doesn’t prevent us from seeing the individual mandate as a tax on freedom—an exercise of Congress’s constitutional power to tax so as to destroy personal and institutional freedom with respect to health insurance.
Author: Michael Stokes Paulsen (Michael Stokes Paulsen)
Casey: Enduring, Entrenched, Intentionally Evil Egregious Error
Casey is not a sound exposition of the Constitution, and its authority should be repudiated by all other actors in our constitutional system The second in a two-part series on the deadly significance of Planned Parenthood v. Casey
Planned Parenthood v. Casey at Twenty: The Worst Constitutional Decision of All Time
In its effects, methodology, substantive doctrine, conception of the judicial role and of judicial authority, and conception of what constitutes the rule of law, Casey is terribly significant and terribly wrong. The first in a two-part series on the deadly significance of Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
The Unprecedented, Extraordinary, Anti-democratic, Activist Power of Judicial Review
President Obama’s recent quips about “judicial activism” do not amount to arguments. They are shallow sloganeering.
Vanderbilt’s Right to Despise Christianity
Vanderbilt University has decided that campus student religious groups may not require that their leaders accept the core beliefs of the religious group they would lead. Ironically, Vanderbilt’s right to do so rests on the same freedom it denies to these groups—a group’s freedom to define what it stands for and the views it expresses.
Obama’s Contraception Cram-down: The Pork Precedent
An ancient example of resistance to a tyrant’s attempt to coerce violations of religious conscience provides an interesting perspective on resistance to the Obama administration’s recent healthcare coverage mandate.
The Unbearable Wrongness of Roe
39 years ago, the Supreme Court delivered a radical, legally untenable, immoral decision. It has forfeited its entitlement to have its decisions respected, and followed, by the other branches of government, by the states, and by the people.
Hosanna in the Highest!
In a recent decision, the Supreme Court has held that the First Amendment provides additional and independent rights to religious organizations, beyond those to which non-religious groups are entitled.
The Most Important Religious Liberty Case of the Past Thirty Years
Freedom of religion means the right of religious persons, groups, and ideas to participate fully and equally in the life of the community and in the marketplace of ideas.
It’s a Girl
The Supreme Court’s abortion jurisprudence appears to protect a right to abortion even for reasons of sex selection. Yet this gruesome reality might provide an opening for a frontal assault on the premises of Roe v. Wade.
Declaration of War: Ten Years Later
Under the Constitution, the Constitution prevails over international law. The Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), signed into law ten years ago this week, prescribed no time limitation or geographical limitation. It was, potentially, a world war of unlimited duration. And yet, our involvement in Libya is unconstitutional.
Where in the Constitution is “Separation of Church and State”?
Misleading talk of "separation of church and state" obscures the true meaning of the First Amendment.
Exporting Death to Kenya
America’s abortion laws may inspire a dangerous provision in Kenya’s new constitution.