Monthly Archives: January 2011


by on January 31st, 2011

On the dualism of degrading desire.

by on January 28th, 2011

Repealing health care is the next fight in the battle for life.

by on January 26th, 2011

An uncertain legal landscape puts future prosperity at risk.

by on January 24th, 2011

We are still reckoning with the legacy of Roe’s fraudulent jurisprudence.

by on January 24th, 2011

Defenders of marriage should draw hope and courage from the pro-life movement’s success.

by on January 21st, 2011

Speaking out requires humility as well as courage.

by on January 19th, 2011

A new book by Noah Feldman explains how Roosevelt’s jurists came to power, and how their constitutional philosophies and disagreements shaped the court.

Do pro-lifers care about life after birth?

by on January 17th, 2011

Announcing the preview of a new online resource from the Witherspoon Institute

by on January 14th, 2011

Whether the case involves pornography or genocide, there are times when authorities must intervene to protect human interests.

by , and on January 12th, 2011

A reply to Northwestern Law Professor Andrew Koppelman's second critique of "What is Marriage?"

by on January 10th, 2011

A new, supposedly objective book on the abortion debate relentlessly tips the scale against life.

by on January 7th, 2011

The ancient tradition of pursuing knowledge for its own sake is slowly, quietly making a comeback.

by on January 5th, 2011

What’s wrong with a prominent professor’s incestuous relationship with his daughter.

by on January 4th, 2011

One scientist’s flawed argument for flawless humans.

by , and on January 3rd, 2011

A reply to NYU Law Professor Kenji Yoshino’s second critique of “What is Marriage?”

In Depth: Islam and Immigration

Agree or disagree with Donald Trump's approach to Islamic immigration, the United States must come to terms with such immigration's cultural and demographic implications.

  • by Joseph G. Trabbic on February 9, 2017

    On Thomistic principles, Trump’s ban on Syrian refugees whose lives are in danger is not morally justifiable. Bans on other travelers and immigrants, however, are not as problematic.

  • by Robert Carle on February 21, 2017

    President Trump’s executive order on immigration is deeply troubling, because it inflicts suffering on “the least of these” for political gain. This demeans the office of the President and robs the United States of its moral high ground in the War on Terror.

  • by Joseph G. Trabbic on August 22, 2016

    Is there a moral obligation for the US not to enact Donald Trump’s proposed ban on Muslim travel into the US?

  • by Luma Simms on March 10, 2016

    Our nation faces an assimilation crisis as many Middle Eastern immigrants reject our culture, which they perceive as libertine. We could improve the situation through a renewed commitment to our founding principles, particularly the reunification of faith and reason.

  • by Robert Carle on October 29, 2015

    A best-selling new novel taps into an angst that has become an obsession in Europe.

  • by Luca Volontè on December 17, 2015

    Europe can only emerge from its downward spiral by putting religious faith and respect for history and tradition at the center of our communal and personal lives.

PD logo

Want more great articles?

Sign up for daily or weekly emails!

subscribe button