Featured
An introductory letter from the founder and editor of Public Discourse.
Young adult men’s support for redefining marriage may not be entirely the product of ideals about expansive freedoms, rights, liberties, and fairness. It may be, in part, a byproduct of regular exposure to diverse and graphic sex acts.
How successful can a “new conversation on marriage” be when its leaders can’t even say what marriage is?
Marriage as a human good, not marriage law, has an objective core whose norms the state has an interest in tracking and supporting—in a way that respects everyone’s freedom.
Whatever same-sex marriage is, that’s not what gays are after. They are after a symbolic vehicle that can make them equal to people who can do something they cannot—procreate.
Family, church, and school are the three basic people-forming institutions, and it is no wonder that they produce the best results—including economic and political ones—when they cooperate.
Web Briefings
-
The Blaze
-
National Review Online
-
The Foundry
-
New York Daily News
-
CBN News
-
The Chuck Colson Center for Christian Worldview
-
Red State
-
The Blaze
-
NYU Law School
-
Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, Arizona State University
-
Dickinson College
-
Heritage Report
-
CNN
-
MSNBC
-
CNN
-
CNN Opinion
-
NPR
-
CNN Opinion
-
Washington Post
-
New York Times
-
Christian Post
-
Right Reason
-
Heritage Backgrounder
-
The Foundry
-
The Weekly Standard
Select Publications
