<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blinded by Scientism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2010/03/1174/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2010/03/1174</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 01:32:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Philosophical Inquiry</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2010/03/1174/comment-page-1#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Philosophical Inquiry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/?p=1174#comment-192</guid>
		<description>[...] Domain names PhilosophicalInquiry.com Philosophical-Inquiry.com PhilosophicalInquiry.net Philosophical-Inquiry.net PhilosophicalInquiry.org Philosophical-Inquiry.org   Featured links Not available...   Related blogs Angels in medieval philosophical inquiry &#124; full and free download ... The search for extra terrestrial intelligence: a philosophical inquiry An essay on the sublime and beautiful. a philosophical inquiry ... Blinded by scientism « public discourse [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Domain names PhilosophicalInquiry.com Philosophical-Inquiry.com PhilosophicalInquiry.net Philosophical-Inquiry.net PhilosophicalInquiry.org Philosophical-Inquiry.org   Featured links Not available&#8230;   Related blogs Angels in medieval philosophical inquiry | full and free download &#8230; The search for extra terrestrial intelligence: a philosophical inquiry An essay on the sublime and beautiful. a philosophical inquiry &#8230; Blinded by scientism « public discourse [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2010-03-11 &#124; The 'K' is not silent</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2010/03/1174/comment-page-1#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2010-03-11 &#124; The 'K' is not silent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/?p=1174#comment-186</guid>
		<description>[...] Blinded by Scientism &quot;Despite its adherents’ pose of rationality, scientism has a serious problem: it is either self-refuting or trivial.&quot; (tags: article editorial publicdiscourse edwardfeser philosophy epistemology * scientism) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blinded by Scientism &quot;Despite its adherents’ pose of rationality, scientism has a serious problem: it is either self-refuting or trivial.&quot; (tags: article editorial publicdiscourse edwardfeser philosophy epistemology * scientism) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recovering Sight after Scientism &#171; Public Discourse</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2010/03/1174/comment-page-1#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Recovering Sight after Scientism &#171; Public Discourse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/?p=1174#comment-184</guid>
		<description>[...] we must embrace a return to philosophy. The second article in a two-part series. As I argued in part I, scientism—the view that all real knowledge is scientific knowledge—is either self-refuting or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we must embrace a return to philosophy. The second article in a two-part series. As I argued in part I, scientism—the view that all real knowledge is scientific knowledge—is either self-refuting or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feser on Scientism &#171; The Deeps of Time</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2010/03/1174/comment-page-1#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>Feser on Scientism &#171; The Deeps of Time</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/?p=1174#comment-180</guid>
		<description>[...] Read here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MUST-READ: What&#8217;s the difference between science and scientism? &#171; Wintery Knight</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2010/03/1174/comment-page-1#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>MUST-READ: What&#8217;s the difference between science and scientism? &#171; Wintery Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/?p=1174#comment-179</guid>
		<description>[...] What&#8217;s the difference between science and&#160;scientism?  Here&#8217;s an article by Edward Feser at Public Discourse. (H/T via [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What&#8217;s the difference between science and&nbsp;scientism?  Here&#8217;s an article by Edward Feser at Public Discourse. (H/T via [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scientism Isn&#8217;t Science &#187; Secondhand Smoke &#124; A First Things Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2010/03/1174/comment-page-1#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Scientism Isn&#8217;t Science &#187; Secondhand Smoke &#124; A First Things Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/?p=1174#comment-178</guid>
		<description>[...] Edward Feser over at Public Discourse explores the differences between science and scientism. From the article: Scientism is the view that all real knowledge is scientific knowledge—that there is no rational, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Edward Feser over at Public Discourse explores the differences between science and scientism. From the article: Scientism is the view that all real knowledge is scientific knowledge—that there is no rational, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Blinded by Scientism</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2010/03/1174/comment-page-1#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Blinded by Scientism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/?p=1174#comment-177</guid>
		<description>[...] Feser writes at Public Discourse: &#8220;The problem with scientism is that it is either self-defeating or trivially true. F.A. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Feser writes at Public Discourse: &#8220;The problem with scientism is that it is either self-defeating or trivially true. F.A. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Divine Conspiracy Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Scientism</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2010/03/1174/comment-page-1#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>The Divine Conspiracy Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Scientism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/?p=1174#comment-176</guid>
		<description>[...] more here.  Posted in Philosophy, Science &#124; No Comments &#187;    Leave a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more here.  Posted in Philosophy, Science | No Comments &raquo;    Leave a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

