<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Darwin’s Disciples Today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2009/12/1067/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2009/12/1067</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:33:41 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Darwin&#8217;s Disciples Today</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2009/12/1067/comment-page-1#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Darwin&#8217;s Disciples Today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2009/12/1067#comment-106</guid>
		<description>[...] Holloway writes at Public Discourse: &#8220;As we celebrate the 200th anniversary of Charles Darwin’s birth and the 150th anniversary [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Holloway writes at Public Discourse: &#8220;As we celebrate the 200th anniversary of Charles Darwin’s birth and the 150th anniversary [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Origins of Darwinian Political Thought &#171; Public Discourse</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2009/12/1067/comment-page-1#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>The Origins of Darwinian Political Thought &#171; Public Discourse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2009/12/1067#comment-104</guid>
		<description>[...] The first attempts to draw political guidance from Darwin, then, on both the Left and the Right, turn out to be not examples of a scientific political theory but examples—however sophisticated, sincere, and well-intentioned—of the partial appropriation of scientific concepts for pre-determined ideological ends. Their popularization therefore led not to the enlightenment of the public discourse but the reverse. As we will see in the second part of this article, contemporary examples of Darwinian political theory, on both the Left and Right, fare no better.  Carson Holloway is an Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Nebraska at Omaha. He is the author of The Right Darwin? Evolution, Religion, and the Future of Democracy and a contributor to Darwinian Conservatism: A Disputed Question. This article is the first of a two-part series. Read the second installment here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The first attempts to draw political guidance from Darwin, then, on both the Left and the Right, turn out to be not examples of a scientific political theory but examples—however sophisticated, sincere, and well-intentioned—of the partial appropriation of scientific concepts for pre-determined ideological ends. Their popularization therefore led not to the enlightenment of the public discourse but the reverse. As we will see in the second part of this article, contemporary examples of Darwinian political theory, on both the Left and Right, fare no better.  Carson Holloway is an Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Nebraska at Omaha. He is the author of The Right Darwin? Evolution, Religion, and the Future of Democracy and a contributor to Darwinian Conservatism: A Disputed Question. This article is the first of a two-part series. Read the second installment here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
