<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Conservatism Is Here to Stay</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2009/10/976/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2009/10/976</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:45:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Article VI Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Iowa, Issues, Identity; Problems in the GOP, and . . . &#8220;The Mormon Ethic of Civility&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2009/10/976/comment-page-1#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Article VI Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Iowa, Issues, Identity; Problems in the GOP, and . . . &#8220;The Mormon Ethic of Civility&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/?p=976#comment-74</guid>
		<description>[...] . . is losing touch with its base?  Is that because it is too conservative, or not?  &#8220;Compassionate Conservatism&#8221; was theoretically socially conservative, fiscally [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] . . is losing touch with its base?  Is that because it is too conservative, or not?  &#8220;Compassionate Conservatism&#8221; was theoretically socially conservative, fiscally [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Latte Links (10/23) &#124; Caffeinated Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2009/10/976/comment-page-1#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Latte Links (10/23) &#124; Caffeinated Thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 02:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/?p=976#comment-72</guid>
		<description>[...] Discourse: Social Conservatism Is Here to Stay by Matthew Schmitz (HT: IFPC [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Discourse: Social Conservatism Is Here to Stay by Matthew Schmitz (HT: IFPC [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Social conservatism is here to stay</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2009/10/976/comment-page-1#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Social conservatism is here to stay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/?p=976#comment-71</guid>
		<description>[...] Schmitz writing at Public Discourse: &#8220;[David] Frum called for a wealthier, more suburban, and more North-Eastern Republican [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Schmitz writing at Public Discourse: &#8220;[David] Frum called for a wealthier, more suburban, and more North-Eastern Republican [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
